Under Review 2015-01-22. PNAS submission tips & Quick Journal facts. Author Approved Submission 2019-08-02. Hassan, the ‘under review‘ status requires a lot of patience in the journal publishing ‘world’, because there’s usually no feed back time frame provided: First, it takes forever to. Established in 1914 as the peer reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), PNAS is now one of the largest and most-cited multidisciplinary scientific journals. Under Editorial Board Review 2019-08-05. 但是，基于当前您的稿件处于Under Editor Review的状态，并且投稿的是一家顶级期刊（如您所述），对于像《美国国家科学院院刊》（PNAS）这类的期刊，Under Editor Review这类审核状态还是比较常见的。如果是这样的话，稿件审核的流程可能有些微的不同。. The editor then issues a decision letter. I have recently checked the research records (on ORCID, Scopus and Scholar) of Nature editors, I have also conducted web searches to trace their academic background, and I found that the majority. A PDF list of Editorial Board members and staff members are posted on the current issue Table of Contents; click on the [Masthead (PDF)] link in the upper right corner. Under Review 2015-07-27 Under Editor Review 2015-07-27 Under Editorial Board Review 2015-07-23 Quality Control Review Completed 2015-07-23 Quality Control Review Started 2015-07-23. Short answer: no (dont bother). The definition of editor acceptance rate is the percentage of all articles submitted to Science Advances Editor anonymous that was accepted for publication. After a lot of consideration, it seemed that PNASwas our best hypothesis because our protein is of general interest and our work covers more than a discipline. If a contribution passes this initial review, it is then taken over by one of the Member Editors, who may enlist specialist reviewers and evaluates their recommendations. In this case, the reviewer would strongly support a PNAS paper. PNAS relies on the time and expertise of volunteer reviewers to maintain its high editorial standards. Why many editors of Nature have very poor research records?!. We received comments from 2 reviewers, neither who provided. The word recommendation is used. The reviewers fully understood the paper and their comments really made the paper better. It could mean that you are right on the cusp of an R&R and the editor wants another opinion. Pnas under editorial board review pending recommendation. required review completed 表示审稿意见已经返回给编辑，等编辑处理。. It depends on a journal and peer review process for that journal. 2216268120 3 of 10 prefrontal cortex (DLPFC; F4), nearly silent in S1, showed a. Using a dataset of 1,000,000 papers from six publishers over the past two decades, we find fewer non-White editors than would be expected based on their share of authorship. Peer Review Process Tier 1: Editorial Board assessment The PNAS Editorial Board is made up of NAS members who are active scientists and experts in their fields. As of 15 March 2015, I’m taking a 3 year stint on the editorial board of PNAS. Peer review 同行评审，耗时最久，也是影响杂志社决定的关键环节。 现投稿量激增，为保证质量，高水平的杂志均事先设in-house review，不过关的稿件被立即拒绝。 9. What we do is read the paper and then decide whether to forward it to a handling editor. The Member Editor conveys their decision to the Editorial Board Member, who makes the final decision. Conclusions are supported by data. What its like to submit a paper to PNAS when you are not famous. PNAS的评审流程一共有 3层Review, 首先是 Editorial Board Review ,过了之后再送到 Editor手里 review, Editor make decision觉得你的paper值得送Reviewer,才会进入Under Review阶段。 如果你的Stage从Under Editorial Board Review直接跳到了Pending Recommendation 或者 从 Under Editor Review直接跳到了Pending Recommendation，这两种情况下都大概率意味着paper被reject了，不久后就会收到reject的消息。. This paper was previously rejected after review by eLIFE. PNAS MS# 2013-08495 Decision Notification 2013-07-31 On Jul 31st we received our first round of reviews. It is still better than Science. Please share with the community how many days the entire process took by the editors office. On submission, your paper is assigned to an Editorial Board member in one of the 31 NAS disciplines. Our paper on regenerative axonal fusion is now under review at PNAS!! This would be the Neumann labs first original research paper. Based on the Journal Acceptance Rate Feedback System database, the latest acceptance rate of PNAS is 50. Editorial Board / PNAS Nexus / Oxford Academic Editorial Board President of the Academy Marcia K. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (often abbreviated PNAS or PNAS USA) is a peer-reviewed multidisciplinary scientific journal. Write a review Duration from Submission to Acceptance 118. What does it mean if my article status changes from. It is the official journal of the National Academy of Sciences, published since 1915, and publishes original research, scientific reviews, commentaries, and. So I normally decline invitations to serve as PE (or member-editor, which is another category) for PNAS (and as editor, associate editor, etc. Such a paper raises questions which have the potential of inspiring deep questions which lead to important discoveries. Submitting your Manuscript. Motivation: The review process was overall good and efficient. In each, treatment of acute myeloid leukemia was performed with allogenic hematopoietic stem. Part two, role of the editorial board. Under Review: This status means that the manuscript is under peer review. Under review= 論文の査読が行われている状態; Pending decision= Academic Editorが最初の評価を行っている状態(通常、48時間程度かかります) Pending major or minor revisions= 著者による修正が行われている状態; Pending editor decision＝ Academic Editorが最終決定を行っている状態. Under Editorial Board Review 2015-10-05. McNutt National Academy of Sciences USA Editor-in-Chief Yannis C. Treatment of HIV-1 ADA-infected CD34+ NSG-humanized mice with long-acting ester prodrugs of cabotegravir, lamivudine, and abacavir in combination with native rilpivirine was followed by dual CRISPR-Cas9 C-C chemokine receptor type five (CCR5) and HIV-1 proviral DNA gene editing. Scientists are elected by their peers to membership in the NAS for outstanding contributions to research. ‘With Editor’ means that it is with the handling or associate editor, who is performing an initial check on your manuscript, for factors such as basic language and quality and match with the journal’s scope. The NAS is committed to furthering science in America, and. Its impact factor is less than that of Science but nonetheless it is highly competitive. It took four weeks for PNAS editorial board to find an editor. PNAS is probably the most clubby journal in the history of academia. Average duration of Pending Decision?. After the editorial check, the editor will assign between 2 and 6 reviewers. In the reviews, Reviewer 2 continued to be positive across the. A PDF list of Editorial Board members and staff members are posted on the current issue Table of Contents; click on the [Masthead (PDF)] link in the upper right corner. Brent Neumann lab news, blog, and images. The time taken so far seems to be fairly standard for their evaluation process. Quality Control Review Completed 2015-10-05. The Action Editor (i. In this part of the series, we focus on the role of the editor and their editorial board in the publishing process. Using a dataset of 1,000,000 papers from six publishers over the past two decades, we find fewer non-White editors than would be expected based on their share of authorship. Evaluate the submission’s suitability for PNAS and determine whether the manuscript should go out for review or be rejected. Peer reviewers are busy scientists, and peer review is an honorary service that requires detailed scrutiny and evaluation of the. PNAS的评审流程一共有3层Review, 首先是Editorial Board Review,过了之后再送到Editor手里 review, Editor make decision觉得你的paper值得送Reviewer,才会进入“Under Review”阶段。如果你的Stage从“Under Editorial Board Review直接跳到了”Pending Recommendation 或者 从 “Under Editor Review直接跳. 22nd Oct, 2021. In general Science publishes strikingly novel work while Nature usually publishes extensive work. What we do is read the paper and then decide whether to forward it to a handling editor. The editors of Nature are full time administrators - they will make an initial assessment before assigning an article for peer review. )? If not, it is little more than a waste of time to try to add the information to your application. The highly efficient staff know just the experts to send it to. On the fourth day, it went from Under Editorial Board Review to Pending. This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons. The problem is that PNAS chooses to pick editors from their fancy-pants collection of academy members. The scientists, who sent a signed letter to the journal PNAS on Thursday, say that the paper is based on false statements and flawed statistical analysis and could encourage people to put themselves at risk by congregating in groups, believing that wearing a mask is enough to protect them from infection. Under review= 論文の査読が行われている状態; Pending decision= Academic Editorが最初の評価を行っている状態(通常、48時間程度かかります) Pending major or minor revisions= 著者による修正が行われている状態; Pending editor decision＝ Academic Editorが最終決定を行っている状態. ’ This is only a recommendation, and not a decision. Our paper on regenerative axonal fusion is now under review at PNAS!! This would be the Neumann labs first original research paper. Answer: The change in status from Under review to Pending recommendation means that peer review of your paper is done and the Associate Editor (AE) will now go through the reviews and give his/her recommendation on whether it should be accepted, rejected, or revised. Although I respect the role of journal editor and deeply appreciate and honor those who take on this crucial job in our profession, I prefer to make my contributions in other ways. The word recommendation is used because the. 4 weeks n/a 3 reports 3 4 Rejected 2022 Motivation: Fast handling, eternal review only takes 10 days n/a n/a 45 days n/a n/a n/a. What does Under Editor Review mean?. ‘With Editor’ means that it is with the handling or associate editor, who is performing an initial check on your manuscript, for factors such as basic language and quality and match with the journal’s scope. This reviewer feels that the present paper is closer in spirit to situation b). This is the editorial board’s evaluation which is seemingly the basis for desk rejection (my emphasis): Editorial Board Member Comments: Thank you for sending PNAS your paper on this important topic. Long-acting antiretroviral drugs suppress viral replication in humanized mice. The inaugural issue features three editorials on the journal’s mission and scope from the president of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the National Academy of Medicine, respectively, in addition to the editorial from Editor-in-Chief Karen Nelson. Surge of neurophysiological coupling and connectivity of …. Dear Members, What does it mean when the status of an article moves from Undergoing Initial Checking directly to Pending Recommendation, Associate Editor Assigned. 0 days The average number of days between the date of manuscript submission and date of receiving the editorial acceptance decision. Basically, as has been suggested, it sounds the reviewers have submitted their comments (positive or negative) and the EIC has to deliver the final verdict. Some editors keep a paper for long time, more than 6 months or a year, without a decision and when send them a reminder message they do not reply or sometimes reply for the first time saying that. The speed of the review process depends very much on the combination of journal, (associate) editors and reviewers. Quality Control Review Completed 2015-01-12. Under Editor Review 2015-11-03. The AE will now communicate their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who makes the final decision. National Academy of Sciences, USA. Unfortunately, our general-science audience would be unlikely to find this research programmatic enough to be fully convinced—nor does it have a …. Publishing in a scholarly journal: Part two, role of the editorial board. PDF PNAS Direct Submission Consultative Peer Review Pilot. 1 Answer to this question. We contribute to this literature by examining disparities in i) editorial board representation, ii) time spent under review, and iii) citation rates. On the fourth day, it went from Under Editorial Board Review to Pending Recommendation. There is no way of knowing whether the reviews they already have are borderline or just of. If the paper meets all criteria, PNAS will inform the authors that the work has been approved for further review using the Consultative Review process. The handling editor and all reviewers are very positive and polite. Abstract Treatment of HIV-1 ADA -infected CD34+ NSG-humanized mice with long-acting ester prodrugs of cabotegravir, lamivudine, and abacavir in combination with native rilpivirine was followed by dual CRISPR-Cas9 C-C chemokine receptor type five (CCR5) and HIV-1 proviral DNA gene editing. Answer: For most journals, ‘With Editor’ means that the manuscript is with the associate editor (AE), who is going through it to check for aspects such as the scope match, novelty of the study, quality of the writing, and adherence to the journal’s submission guidelines. At the pending decision stage, all the reviews are finalized and the editor is about to make a decision based on those reviews. The inaugural issue features three editorials on the journal’s mission and scope from the president of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the National Academy of Medicine, respectively, in addition to the editorial from Editor-in-Chief Karen Nelson. PNAS>Instructions for Authors. Brenner, NAM Sanford Burnham Prebys. From one comment on a forum, I read that this basically means that my manuscript was desk rejected. During a two-year experiment beginning in June 2022, PNAS will offer a Consultative Review option to all Direct Submission authors whose research is. I have recently checked the research records (on ORCID, Scopus and Scholar) of Nature editors, I have also conducted web searches to trace their academic background, and I found that the majority. Yortsos, NAE Viterbi School of Engineering University of Southern California USA Deputy Editors Biological, Health, and Medical Sciences David A. PNAS is edited by members of the NAS, a private, nonprofit society of distinguished scholars. PNAS Under Editorial Board Review 40 几天 - Biology版 - 未名存档 本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档，一周内的贴子最多显示50字，超过一周显示500字 访问原贴 Biology版 - PNAS Under Editorial Board Review 40 几天 相关主题 PNAS是不是悲剧了？ PNAS 咋这么慢 ？ PNAS有戏吗？ PNAS under review 不到一周就Pending Final Recommendation 求助 PNAS审稿时间问题 PNAS 投稿 PNAS 审稿疑问 PNAS submission. This led to sequential viral suppression, restoration of absolute human CD4 + T cell numbers, then elimination of. Answer: The change in status from Under review to Pending recommendation means that peer review of your paper is done and the Associate Editor (AE) will now go through the reviews and give his/her recommendation on whether it should be accepted, rejected, or revised. Tracking your manuscript status in journal submission systems>Tracking your manuscript status in journal submission systems. 当PI之后投的第一篇PNAS。 学生一作我通讯作者，合作者全是小虾米。 direct submission，没有通过院士。 据说这种50%以上在editor这一关就被拒了。 觉得通过 editor这一关就算big success了。 今天查状态变成这样了。 是不是已经送审了？ 简直不敢相信这种小概率事件！ 上来求个 bless. What is the meaning of the status pending recommendation?. PNAS relies on the time and expertise of volunteer reviewers to maintain its high editorial standards. Response: At Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology and many other journals, editorial board members often serve as reviewers. Why this editor won’t be sending your paper out for further review at PNAS. n/a n/a 43 days n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im. In each, treatment of acute myeloid leukemia was performed with allogenic hematopoietic stem-cell transplants containing heterozygous or homozygous mutations in the HIV-1 chemokine C-C chemokine receptor type five (CCR5 Δ32) gene (). What is the meaning of Under editor evaluation?. Each paper is assigned to a member of the PNAS Editorial Board from one of the 31 branches or disciplines defined by the journal. Under Review: This status means that the manuscript is under peer review. Update March 7th, 2017: Unfortunately after 52 days in review, our paper has been rejected. Neumann lab news, blog, and images. PNAS 2023 Vol. At the pending decision stage, all the reviews are finalized and the editor is about to make a decision based on those reviews. I have a paper currently under review, and, it seems that the status will remain under review after I submit my application packages. Yortsos, NAE Viterbi School of Engineering University of Southern California USA Deputy Editors Biological, Health, and Medical Sciences David A. PNAS的评审流程一共有3层Review, 首先是Editorial Board Review,过了之后再送到Editor手里 review, Editor make decision觉得你的paper值得送Reviewer,才会进入“Under Review”阶段。如果你的Stage从“Under. Under Editorial Board Review 2015-01-12. 30/3/2017 0 Comments Our paper on regenerative axonal fusion is now under review at PNAS!! This would be the Neumann labs first original research paper. It could also mean that one of the reviews they got was a one liner and they are decent enough to not send it to you and are looking for a replacement. Characterization Data, Materials, and Software Availability Acknowledgments References Significance The orthotropic 3D microstructure has recently promoted wood as a template for applications in wood-based energy and electronic devices. My question is: If my paper is accepted or revised or rejected, then should I notify the schools to which I am applying that this paper was accepted or revised or rejected?. Getting straight to your query, the status means that the Associate Editor (AE) has had a look at your manuscript and made a decision on it. Joshua Wand, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, USA. More nuanced answer: it depends. Although I respect the role of journal editor and deeply appreciate and honor those who take on this crucial job in our profession, I prefer to make my contributions in other ways. At the pending decision stage, all the reviews are finalized and the editor is about to make a decision based on those reviews. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (often abbreviated PNAS or PNAS USA) is a peer-reviewed multidisciplinary scientific journal. After reviewers submit their recommendations (usually 2–3 weeks after accepting the invitation), the editor then takes those recommendations and synthesizes them with their own to come up with a decision. A PDF list of Editorial Board members and staff members are posted on the current issue Table of Contents; click on the [Masthead (PDF)] link in the upper right corner. Under review: The paper is with reviewers for comment or waiting for the Action Editors decision. 由于PNAS最多不能超过两轮的审稿，所以三审就是最终的审稿了，成不成功就看这把了。这次Under Review花了4天就结束了，估计也是审稿人疲了，基本上没什么问题就给过了。这里，Pending Recommendation阶段停滞了大概两周，有人投稿这一步时常出现停滞14-30天的情况。. Dear Members, What does it mean when the status of an article moves from Undergoing Initial Checking directly to Pending Recommendation, Associate Editor Assigned. So, based on your two rounds of revisions, the Associate Editor (AE) has made their decision on the manuscript. 21st Mar, 2023 Nobody can know specific time frame of this issue, it depends on Journals and Editors. Motivation: The review process was overall good and efficient. Rapid, high-quality peer review. Once the peer review is complete, the Member Editor goes through the comments for their evaluation (probably indicated by Under Editor Review). Any idea what that means? 2017-11-09 Under Review 2017-11-08 Under Editor Review 2017-11-08 Under Editorial Review 2017-10-26 Quality Control Review Complete 2017-10-26 Quality. Basically, as has been suggested, it sounds the reviewers have submitted their comments (positive or negative) and the EIC has to deliver the final verdict. Established in 1914 as the peer reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), PNAS is now one of the largest and most-cited multidisciplinary scientific journals in the world, with a global readership and more than 3,500 research articles published annually. The highly efficient staff know just the experts to send it to. ‘Under Review’ means (in most cases) that it is undergoing peer review. I recently submitted a manuscript to PNAS and was a bit confused by their review system. PNAS has been at the forefront of scientific research for over a century. Now just hope I have a better luck. Is your paper of earth-shaking significance in some way? Is it going to appear in some renowned journal (Nature, PNAS, Lancet, Journal of the ACM, etc. Peer Review Process Tier 1: Editorial Board assessment The PNAS Editorial Board is made up of NAS members who are active scientists and experts in their fields. Some editors keep a paper for long time, more than 6 months or a year, without a decision and when send them a reminder message they do not reply or sometimes reply for the first time saying that. Quality Control Review Completed 2019-08-05. Pnas pending recommendation how long. 当PI之后投的第一篇PNAS。 学生一作我通讯作者，合作者全是小虾米。 direct submission，没有通过院士。 据说这种50%以上在editor这一关就被拒了。 觉得通过 editor这一关就算big success了。 今天查状态变成这样了。 是不是已经送审了？ 简直不敢相信这种小概率事件！ 上来求个 bless. Add a comment. assigned the manuscript to an Associate Editor - there is no separate system status to indicate this). As of 15 March 2015, I’m taking a 3 year stint on the editorial board of PNAS. We look to reviewers to help PNAS ensure the following in a submitted paper: Research is well designed and executed. The Action Editor may decide to make a decision without allocating reviewers. The reason I decided to write this post is that the review process at PNAS is not like other journals and, based purely on anecdotal evidence (my own experience and that of two other junior PIs), my feeling is that a new PI should not even bother submitting to PNAS unless they have a strong network of NAS members interested in their work, a …. PNAS Under Editorial Board Review 40 几天. Answer: For most journals, ‘With Editor’ means that the manuscript is with the associate editor (AE), who is going through it to check for aspects such as the scope. Based on the Journal Acceptance Rate Feedback System database, the latest acceptance rate of PNAS Editor Donald Canfield is 100. It can take from a week up to 2-3 weeks. Learn about editor contributions to the publishing process, the types of decisions made, common reasons for manuscript rejections, how to become a journal editor, and more. This paper was previously rejected after review by eLIFE. Under Review 2015-11-03. This is the editorial board’s evaluation which is seemingly the basis for desk rejection (my emphasis): Editorial Board Member Comments: Thank you for sending PNAS your paper on this important topic. Peer Review Process Tier 1: Editorial Board assessment The PNAS Editorial Board is made up of NAS members who are active scientists and experts in their fields. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United. Determine whether the paper qualifies for the. PNAS offers quick turn-around times: the initial decision is taken in about 40 days; the average time between acceptance and. Author Approved Submission 2015-01-09. Although the Rademacher Conjecture is not as important as RH, it is central. This simply means, 2-6 researchers will receive an email requesting them review your manuscript. Stage Start Date (as of 2019-08-28) Under Editor Review 2019-08-05 Under Editorial Board Review 2019-08-05 Quality Control Review Completed 2019-08-05 Quality Control Review Started 2019-08-02 Author Approved Submission 2019-08-02 1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !. Washington, DC – The National Academy of Sciences (NAS) is pleased to announce the publication of the inaugural issue of PNAS Nexus, a selective, open access journal with a focus on multi-, trans-, and inter-disciplinary work across the biological, physical, and social sciences, and mathematics, particularly encompassing engineering. We contribute to this literature by examining disparities in i) editorial board representation, ii) time spent under review, and iii) citation rates. I note, at this stage, the reply from an. Of particular interest are those articles with broad, interdisciplinary appeal. PNAS Acceptance Rate 50. Online archive. Pnas Under Editor ReviewI recently submitted a manuscript to PNAS and was a bit confused by their review system. No idea, mine has been under editorial board review for 26 days. Editorial and Journal Policies. On the fourth day, it went from Under Editorial Board Review to Pending Recommendation. Our paper on regenerative axonal fusion is now under review at PNAS!! This would be the Neumann labs first original research paper. So I normally decline invitations to serve as PE (or member-editor, which is another category) for PNAS (and as editor, associate editor, etc. I suggest that availability of experience at different publishers and journals is important. Each reviewer is normally allowed 28 days to submit his or her report, but may occasionally be allowed longer. Publishing in PNAS is not an easy job even if you think your work is good enough. under review changes >publications. Why this editor won’t be sending your paper out for further. About PNAS. Bio-based materials will be the underpinning …. Under review 编辑部或审稿人正在审稿，前者对稿件录用倾向做预期评估。 含义与“peer review”不完全一致。 此时论文是由同行评审员进行外审，因为审稿是无偿的工作加上需要付出许多精力，这个过程应该是一个漫长的等待。 如果被邀请审稿人不想审，就会decline，编辑会重新邀请别的审稿人。 注意，有些期刊一提交就会显示Under review，别以为已经送审了哈。 8. 19 e2216268120 https://doi manuscript editing; and J. Question on PNAS review system : r/academia. When administered CRISPR-mediated CCR5 and HIV-1LTR-Gag CRISPR editing the treatments resulted in the elimination of HIV-1 proviral DNA in lymphoid, bone marrow, and central nervous system tissues in 58% of the infected. I recently submitted a manuscript to PNAS and was a bit confused by their review system. However, note the use of the word ‘recommendation. Answer: The change in status from Under review to Pending recommendation means that peer review of your paper is done and the Associate. Pnas under editorial board review pending final recommendation. 1 Answer Sorted by: 2 Short answer: no (dont bother). Submission Experiences « 1 2 » Popular Journals. Review Duration · Review Speed. Surge of neurophysiological coupling and connectivity of. Write a review Duration from Submission to Acceptance 118. As we step into the era of green technologies, there will be an increasing distinction between complex, nanoscale electronics on one hand and simple, large-size or large-area electronics on the other hand, the latter with special functionalities like biosensing, biointegration, biodegradability, etc. We got comments from two reviewers, both liked the idea of the paper but recommended a major revision that. Quality Control Review Started 2019-08-02. Nearly 200 members of the NAS have won Nobel Prizes. MDPIの投稿プロセスについて皆様からのご質問にお答えします. HIV-1 cure included attenuation of. Is there any chance it will proceed to Under Review?. It took four weeks for PNAS editorial board to find an editor. editor won’t be sending your paper out for further >Why this editor won’t be sending your paper out for further. Depends on what you call as level. The editorial board receives guidance. How long do you wait to hear from a journal after you have. Journal Ranking PNAS Journal Ranking Key Factor Analysis. Tracking your manuscript status in journal submission …. More granular details on manuscript formatting, including guidance on information to include in each section of the file, are included in the Manuscript Formatting Guidelines below. HIV-1 was not detected in the blood, spleen, lung, kidney, liver, gut, bone marrow, and brain of virus-free animals. The definition of editor acceptance rate is the percentage of all articles submitted to Donald Canfield that was accepted for publication. Joann Whalen, Department of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, Canada. Reviewer 2 was positive providing constructive feedback. Electrical current modulation in wood electrochemical. This constraint entails many problems: The PNAS members don’t cover all fields, especially new ones like computational biology (unless you mean structural biology), and these famous people are terribly busy. Write a review Duration from Submission to Acceptance 114. A functional cure of HIV-1 infection has been documented in three cases (1–3). Is your paper of earth-shaking significance in some way? Is it going to appear in some renowned journal (Nature, PNAS, Lancet, Journal of the ACM, etc. • provide a short (50-150 word) justification for review under the Consultative Review option, • provide the names of at least four prearranged reviewers, and • provide a brief justification for why each reviewer is appropriate, as well as confirmation that the reviewers do not have competing interests as defined by PNAS guidelines. PNAS Under Editorial Board Review 40 几天 - Biology版 - 未名存档 本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档，一周内的贴子最多显示50字，超过一周显示500字 访问原贴 Biology版 - PNAS Under Editorial Board Review 40 几天 相关主题 PNAS是不是悲剧了？ PNAS 咋这么慢 ？ PNAS有戏吗？ PNAS under review 不到一周就Pending Final Recommendation 求助 PNAS审稿时间问题 PNAS 投稿 PNAS 审稿疑问 PNAS submission. PNAS will consider manuscripts for review as long as all components listed above are included in the submission. Update March 7th, 2017: Unfortunately after 52 days in review, our paper has been rejected. On Feb 11th we received a final round of reviews with a rejection decision by the chairman of the Editorial Board. Introducing the PNAS Consultative Review Pilot. Two of the three reviewers provided very thorough reviews and detailed comments. PNAS relies on the time and expertise of volunteer reviewers to maintain its high editorial standards. Data are unambiguous and properly analyzed. CRISPR editing of CCR5 and HIV. Highly sensitive nucleic acid nested and droplet digital PCR, RNAscope, and viral outgrowth assays affirmed viral elimination. years about less important proteins and without validation of the data or relevance in vivo of the data. PNAS Nexus is an open access scientific journal focused on the publication of high-quality original research from across the biological, medical, physical, social, and political sciences, and engineering and mathematics. Stage Start Date (as of 2019-08-28) Under Editor Review 2019-08-05. Under Editor Review 2015-01-21. 但是，基于当前您的稿件处于“Under Editor Review”的状态，并且投稿的是一家顶级期刊（如您所述），对于像《美国国家科学院院刊》（PNAS）这类的期刊，“Under Editor Review”这类审核状态还是比较常见的。. Editorial Board / PNAS Nexus / Oxford Academic Editorial Board President of the Academy Marcia K. the Editor or Associate Editor who is handling your paper) will usually invite two or three reviewers to comment on the article and make a recommendation about its suitability for publication. 7 days The average number of days between the date of manuscript submission and date of receiving the editorial acceptance decision. Answer: The change in status from Under review to Pending recommendation means that peer review of your paper is done and the Associate Editor (AE) will now go through the reviews and give his/her recommendation on whether it should be accepted, rejected, or revised. What does pending recommendation mean in pnas. Reviewer 3 was less so but wrote essentially positive comments asking for some changes and clarifications. Though most of the editors have scientific training it’s. Is there any chance it will proceed to Under Review?. 6k GOOD PUBLISHING PRACTICES PNAS offers quick turn-around times: the initial decision is taken in about 40 days; the average time between acceptance and publication online is one month; and the average time between submission and publication (including the print edition) is less than 6 months. Rapid, high-quality peer review PNAS is edited by members of the NAS, a private, nonprofit society of distinguished scholars. We look to reviewers to help PNAS ensure the following in a submitted paper: Research is well designed and executed. (Looking at you SF - the journal of one line reviews!) Bottom line: chill out. More than 2,600 NAS members and Foreign Associates are eligible to serve as member editors; 1,214 members handled papers in 2013. PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences) publishes more than 3000 research papers annually in all branches of science - physical, social, and biological - and requires that all papers be intelligible to a broad scientific audience. Stage Start Date (as of 2019-08-28) Under Editor Review 2019-08-05 Under Editorial Board Review 2019-08-05 Quality Control Review Completed 2019-08-05 Quality Control Review Started 2019-08-02 Author Approved Submission 2019-08-02 1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !. Therefore, it is very difficult to say something about Elsevier journals - they. We contribute to this literature by examining disparities in i) editorial board representation, ii) time spent under review, and iii) citation rates. If you publish there frequently, you should basically feel ashamed. Each paper is assigned to a member of the PNAS Editorial Board from one of the 31 branches or disciplines defined by the journal. Anyone care to share their experiences?. The said experts are sat at their desks, open the email immediately & review your paper straight away (as they have nothing else. Highly sensitive nucleic acid nested and droplet digital PCR, RNAscope, and viral outgrowth assays affirmed viral elimination. Rapid, high-quality peer review PNAS is edited by members of the NAS, a private, nonprofit society of distinguished scholars. Answer: The change in status from Under review to Pending recommendation means that peer review of your paper is done and the Associate Editor (AE) will now go through the reviews and give his/her recommendation on whether it should be accepted, rejected, or revised. Weekly (52 issues a year, which make up one volume). PNAS的评审流程一共有3层Review, 首先是Editorial Board Review,过了之后再送到Editor手里 review, Editor make decision觉得你的paper值得送Reviewer,才会进入“Under Review”阶段。如果你的Stage从“Under Editorial Board Review直接跳到了”Pending Recommendation 或者 从 “Under Editor Review直接跳. It is the official journal of the National Academy of Sciences, published since 1915, and publishes original research, scientific reviews, commentaries, and letters. I expected the article to change to Under Review. Based on the Journal Acceptance Rate Feedback System database, the latest acceptance rate of Science Advances Editor anonymous is 100. of the status pending recommendation?>What is the meaning of the status pending recommendation?. Under review to pending recommendation to under review >Under review to pending recommendation to under review. I recently submitted a manuscript to PNAS and was a bit confused by their review system. You can firstly check the journal ranking by links below: (Ranking journal. Rather, it refers to the final decision by the Editor-in-Chief (EIC). Pnas under editorial board review pending recommendation 19 Under Editor Review 2019-08-19 Under Editorial Board Review 2019-08-14 Author Approved Submission 2019-08-14 1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab ! I submitted an article to PNAS got positive revisions and resubmitted the revised manuscript. PNAS Information for Authors. It could mean that you are right on the cusp of an R&R and the editor wants another opinion. Presentation of methods will permit replication. It depends on a journal and peer review process for that journal. Editor Acceptance Rate Review Orla Acceptance Rate. Academic Accelerator Acceptance Rate PNAS Last updated on May 03, 2023 [2023-05-03] PNAS Acceptance Rate · Rejection Rate · Submission Experiences ·. Although I respect the role of journal editor and deeply appreciate and honor those who take on this crucial job in our profession, I prefer to make my contributions in other ways. Long-acting antiretroviral drugs suppress viral replication in humanized mice. 但是，基于当前您的稿件处于“Under Editor Review”的状态，并且投稿的是一家顶级期刊（如您所述），对于像《美国国家科学院院刊》（PNAS）这类的期刊，“Under Editor Review”这类审核状态还是比较常见的。. The problem is that PNAS chooses to pick editors from their fancy-pants collection of academy members. Waiting for Author Approval of Converted Files 2015-01-09. On Feb 11th we received a final round of reviews with a rejection decision by the chairman of the Editorial Board. Hence, this is perhaps the most time-consuming part of the entire publication process. Dear Members, What does it mean when the status of an article moves from Undergoing Initial Checking directly to Pending Recommendation, Associate Editor Assigned. org/author-center/editorial-and-journal-policies#SnippetTab h=ID=SERP,5791. Multiple rounds of review and revision are strongly discouraged. As we step into the era of green technologies, there will be an increasing distinction between complex, nanoscale electronics on one hand and simple, large-size or large-area electronics on the other hand, the latter with special functionalities like biosensing, biointegration, biodegradability, etc. After review, the member editor makes a recommendation about acceptance to the Editorial Board member. PNAS is edited by members of the NAS, a private, nonprofit society of distinguished scholars. PDF What Happens to My Paper. Rapid, high-quality peer review. We got comments from two reviewers, both liked the idea of the paper but recommended a major revision that required a lot of effort from our side. I expected the article to change to Under Review. McNutt National Academy of Sciences USA Editor-in-Chief Yannis C. 1 C analyzes each publisher in isolation, showing that countries in Asia, Africa, and South America are more likely to be underrepresented on the editorial boards of each publisher, with the only exception being PNAS, whose editors are predominantly US based since they are all members of the National Academy of Sciences. Pnas under editorial board review pending recommendation>Pnas under editorial board review pending recommendation. Reviewers Instructions & Acknowledgement. Getting straight to your query, the status means that the Associate Editor (AE) has had a look at your manuscript and made a decision on it. Right now there are ten of us in the evolution section, so I’m likely to handle a lot of papers. a74b When you submit to PNAS, do you get updates when it passes from the editorial board to the lead editor? Or does it go direct from editorial board to reviewers? Anyway do you get emails after each step? I submitted something two weeks ago, was under the impression that PNAS was pretty quick. If the initial reviews are conflicting,. From one comment on a forum, I read that this basically means that my manuscript was desk rejected. 但是，基于当前您的稿件处于“Under Editor Review”的状态，并且投稿的是一家顶级期刊（如您所述），对于像《美国国家科学院院刊》（PNAS）这类的期刊，“Under Editor. Since editors can exert considerable control over scientific discourse, it is important to identify the underrepresented demographic groups among editors. Answer: For most journals, ‘With Editor’ means that the manuscript is with the associate editor (AE), who is going through it to check for aspects such as the scope match, novelty of the study, quality of the writing, and adherence to the journal’s submission guidelines. Below is the timeline for the stage of. This process usually takes between 2 and 12 week. Although I respect the role of journal editor and deeply appreciate and honor those who take on this crucial job in our profession, I prefer to make my contributions in other ways. Under Review: This status means that the manuscript is under peer review. Under review to pending recommendation to under review. As of 15 March 2015, I’m taking a 3 year stint on the editorial board of PNAS. Editorial Board / PNAS Nexus / Oxford Academic Editorial Board President of the Academy Marcia K. Quality Control Review Started 2015-01-09. Editors are the group of elite decision-makers in science ( 14) who act as “opinion formers, gatekeepers, and arbiters of disciplinary values” ( 15 ). 0 % Write a review See all reviews The definition of journal acceptance rate is the percentage of all articles submitted to PNAS that was accepted for publication. Tracking your manuscript status in journal submission systems. In the reviews, Reviewer 2 continued to be positive across the board, while Reviewer 4 raised a new set of concerns, most of which were not present in the previous review. On Feb 11th we received a final round of reviews with a rejection decision by the chairman of the Editorial Board. Electrical current modulation in wood electrochemical transistor. On submission, your paper is assigned to an Editorial Board member in one of the 31 NAS disciplines.